Challenging Behaviour - Outdated

Challenging Behaviour - Outdated

Challenging Behaviour is a term the healthcare sector has misused for years. When the term was originally introduced, it was an attempt to move away from the then widely used term "behaviourally disturbed". The healthcare sector recognised that the term had become associated with some very negative connotations and therefore should not, in good conscience, be given to an individual.

Labelling in this manner, we understand now, would be detrimental to relationship building between individuals on either side of the cared for / carer divide. Despite this however the term"challenging behaviour" was introduced and very quickly it fell into regular use. This term Challenging Behaviour followed the usual sector path of defaulting through ignorance into a label to assign to a "cared for" individual. There are many reasons why the assigning of this label is used, these range from financial to actively maintaining the power divide in the carer/cared for relationship. Sadly this has been the norm for the last 20 years of my experience, in that time I have repeatedly challenged the belief with thousands of staff on training workshops.

On training even today in introductions on courses staff still make several statements that follow one of these two patterns:

"I work with someone who has challenging behaviour"
"I work in the challenging behaviour unit"

Generally it does not take much teaching and interactive discussion for the group to realise that the term challenging behaviour is outdated. What one person finds challenging another may not. What is an expression of a need by one person may be perceived as a challenge by another.

How many times have you met people in life that you do not gel with due to them having some little quirks that you find irritating. If you believed they were doing this on purpose to cause you upset then you might say they are challenging you. However if you understand that their grinding teeth that drives you crazy is just part of the persons expression, you may say they grind their teeth which I find a challenge.

This leads to a wholly different perception of the behaviour.

He does not have challenging behaviour - he grinds his teeth which I find challenging, whereas you, another person, may not find it a problem.

These phrases set the whole philosophy of the work we do into a "them and us" mentality. This state of mind leads to more people in distress. Well being is achieved through many factors, most significantly having those significant relationships in our lives. Significant relationships are a big factor in all of us maintaining lower stress levels, leading to any one of us displaying less distress that other people may find difficult, disturbing or challenging.

SO WHAT IS IT?

If we look at some of the ways our sector use the term:

A policy

I worked with a policy that used the definition that a behaviour that challenges is any behaviour that enough of the staff group believe constitutes a management issue.

This cannot be considered bad and can be defined depending on the staff groups perceptions. One group worked with an individual who was bed-bound who shouted at them, to those staff he was extremely challenging, and it caused them a management issue. To other staff groups he may not have been challenging at all as he could not move and had never carried out a threat.

one common definition of challenging behaviour is defined by the Challenging Behaviour Foundation

“Culturally abnormal behaviour(s) of such an intensity, frequency or duration that the physical safety of the person or others is likely to be placed in serious jeopardy, or behaviour which is likely to seriously limit use of, or result in the person being denied access to, ordinary community facilities.”

or wikipedia

While these are cited as an Emerson definition in 1995 I can clearly state that prior to 1995 I was a trainer teaching "challenging behaviour" courses, even back in 1995 the definition was easy to pull apart. Someone picking their nose and chewing it will divide a group of staff emotionally but will not be considered challenging under the definition.

Times have moved on and most of the sector are accepting or starting to accept that the term should be used in a more appropriate context.

in recent years the term challenging behaviour has been used to reflect the fact that some of the behaviours that are seen are a challenge to us as professionals, teachers, carers and parents. That the person showing these behaviours is not a ‘problem’ to be fixed, or someone doing something wrong that needs to be sorted, but that the behaviour is a sign that something isn't working. It shows that there is some need being unfulfilled, or a problem with communication.

In essence it is that there is something going wrong that needs to be addressed, not that there is a person doing something wrong who needs to be stopped. Scope.org.uk

This is a common stumbling block in terminology, last year I met a healthcare professional who took an instant dislike to me when I said I was a challenging behaviour trainer. However her mind was aligned with mine and I soon resolved the confusion when she said she hated the term. Unfortunately stating what I do gets predictable reactions through preconceptions see blog post here

Therefore how do we proceed, the sector use the term and professionals in the sector given a bit of experience or training get the point, YET there it is, with every new member of staff setting up the divide in the relationship through the perception of the concept from day one in employment due to use of an outdated term. The invisible barrier sets in.

I propose a new concept, we find a new term. I have some suggestions however we should be careful here, language changes with time and linguistics are geographic in their perception. One service talk about their individuals "going into behaviour", which, from my background I see as just as problematic as using the term "he is becoming challenging". So our concept must address this balance as best we can to help new staff instantly perceive a role of a relationship builder rather than managing he / she who is displaying challenging behaviour. Often a staff member will say:

he is doing it because he is not getting what he wants !

to which I reply

you mean we are not meeting his needs

this is purely a perception issue, both statement mean the same however the second one puts the onus on the staff member to assist rather than blame.

ASSISTING INDIVIDUALS IN DISTRESS

If we used this phrase I believe we are more likely to instil a culture of compassion. Indeed I believe this area of training should be about developing relationships to better assist individuals in distress.

If you had a member of your family who had a head injury and could not communicate to their own satisfaction which therefore led to them displaying distress, would you say:

he is becoming challenging and we need to find a way of controlling him!

or

he seems distressed, what ways can we assist him to regain control to reduce his stress?

I do not think that needs an answer. Yet by using the term challenging behaviour with new staff that is the philosophy gap we ourselves are creating.

TRAINING

Our course Developing Positive Relationships with those in distress covers all you would assume is in a standard challenging behaviour / physical intervention training. However this is the only page on the site you will see the term challenging behaviour as our work is about the relationship building, despite stress, between each other including those we care for.

Develop the relationships - reduce the distress.

Notice from the content that to achieve this, staff support systems need to build in place to underpin relationship development, this works in the same way as the individual in distress needing significant relationships in their daily lives. Your staff group bond into a team, as a side effect of training in this manner, creating supportive staff helping each other assist in relationship building with those in distress.

Ultimately should this not be our goal? What terminology do you use and why?

REF

(taken from the web pages quoted from above)

Ref: Emerson, 1995, cited in Emerson, E (2001, 2nd edition): Challenging Behaviour: Analysis and intervention in people with learning disabilities. Cambridge University Press

^ Emerson, E. 1995. cited in Emerson, Eric (2001). "Challenging behaviour". Challenging Behaviour: Analysis and Intervention in People with Severe Learning Disabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-521-79444-2.

West Wales Open Workshop

DATE: 12-14 October 2020

Narberth Area

This course is Potentially FULL

Register here to reserve your place for the next course

More Posts from the de-escalation blog

During this time of COVID-19 coronavirus

With all of us having concerning times we all need to do what we can for each other. There are many stories of people going above and beyond for those in their community. I see the people who have been through our system as part of our community. We all have people in our lives we need to support and look after due to vulnerabilities. As most of you will work within our industry or have people who you need to support within your household / family you will have difficulties supporting during illness and getting cover. Isolation is a concern - there are effectively physical walls between us.

The paradigm shift staff go through

The mind shift almost always travels from introductions where people say / imply things that contradict the basic philosophy of the course to an ending where people state publicly (or privately to me) how they always thought like this. Usually adding something like - “it is great that a training like this exists so that all those other people I work with whose attitude needs adjusting can access it”.

Age and the different responses

Teaching different groups can lead to predictable responses. When you teach a group where half the participants work with younger kids (under 11 ish) and the other half work with young people (teens) there is a clear dichotomy in their attitudes and responses around problem behaviour. It all comes back to the issue around the distractor versus the reinforcer.

A Place on the Restraint Reduction Network Certified Organisations List

Certification in itself is a process that cannot be rushed, this is a good thing as it is important that the system does exactly what it says on the tin. Throughout the months of preparation, assessment and certification it is hard to appreciate what the outcome will look like for our efforts. Today (6th Feb 2020) the image of the list of certified companies looks like this - today only, however I like the imagery :-)

Debriefing, Post Incident Review, Offloading and the Restraint Reduction Network

As you know from our previous post about offloading we @D8 have always fundamentally separated the concept of Debriefing into 2 distinct and different areas. As we are in 2020 we should add that the Restraint Reduction Network Standards (2019 version 1.1) have also got these laid out into the same 2 areas.

Affect Labelling

Over the last few years we have had a terrific response in terms of de-escalation with our course incorporating Affect Labelling. Emotions arise to make us pay attention to our environment. The more emotional our experience, the less we can think clearly, resist impulses, and engage in constructive problem-solving. By creating even the simplest label, we learn to express what we are experiencing. At a rudimentary level, we think about what is causing us to feel emotion and take action to experience either more or less of the emotion, depending on the situation.

Update Days - Interesting Responses

In a previous life I worked as a trainer for another organisation. This organisation had several trainers which meant when delivering update days I would, more often than not, be delivering an update day to a group who I had not delivered the original course to.When doing the introductions on an update day I used to consistently hear a couple of common comments.

Holiday Cottage

D.ESCAL8™ know it can sometimes be difficult finding somewhere to take the individuals we support on holiday. Concerns around behaviour - particularly noise and breakages - make supporters feel limited in the choice of accommodation. D.ESCAL8™ recommend Fronrhydwen, a family run smallholding in Pembrokeshire, where Des Cooke lets out a cottage for holidays. The four bedded accommodation is set in a rural 4 acres, affording space and quiet, whilst being situated a short drive from all the area has to offer. Des and his family have welcomed individuals and their carers on many occasions. They have a relaxed and flexible approach e.g. acceptance that noise is part of life.

Offloading - a subsection of de-briefing

If there is any indication or suspicion that anyone has suffered an injury or psychological trauma following the incident / use of physical intervention they must receive treatment and support as soon as is reasonably possible. Debriefing is misused as a term, and while analysis is important in a Positive Behaviour Support framework, your D.ESCAL8™ facilitator discussed these two areas and the differences between debriefing and offloading. 

What kind of support carer are you?

When under pressure we respond in a small number of differing ways. These tend to be in 2 main camps. Those who feel the need to control and those who have a more relaxed attitude. The question is which has a better effect on the person in distress? Picture this, you are under pressure and in distress and you shout at your partner "just get me my dinner!" and your partner replies "No, you will not talk to me in that manner! ENOUGH now."

Participant PDF Certificate Access Online

the D8 admin system has developed steadily over the last few years and is now at the point where we can release individual participant online access to their own digital certificates. This has been a while coming and the certificates do not look anything like their physical solid card counterparts. However it does mean participants who for one reason or another do not get their certificate from the course organiser or have lost it, can gain a digital replacement themselves online.

de-escalation and PBS training hubs

From Inception D8 was formed as a method of getting high quality training to those who care for individuals in distress. Part of that concept involves smaller companies and individuals who find accessing training prohibitive for various reasons. Apart from the obvious cost implications with running a full training course there are also the implications regarding closing a business to release staff for the course to occur.

Parent and Family Workshops - Assisting Individuals in Distress

Over the last few years we have been having many conversations with family members who say they never receive support with their child or relative's behaviour.For a long time we debated how to achieve supporting family around their person. I grew up with disabilities as part of my family life and therefore am quite close to the fundamental idea that we are in a great positions to assist others.

What should we be focussing on in DeBriefing

The term debriefing is an industry-used term. In our industry while useful it is often misunderstood when talking about application at ground floor or grassroots level. When discussing the term de-briefing we @de-escalate.com have separated the term debriefing into different areas. I will discuss one of these here.

Training Administration System

A brief conversation around the administration system that we use on a daily basis.

Attachment Trauma & Relationships

Recently I was lucky enough to attend the latest BILD seminar entitled - Attachment Trauma & Relationships D.ESCAL8 has, from its inception, focused on attachment, trauma and resilience in relationships and in our main course titled – “Developing Positive Relationships with Individuals in Distress”. I was therefore interested in this seminar in particular and was able to swing my timetable to go in the last few days prior to the event.

Positive Behavour Support Training Animation

PBS, Positive Behaviour Support Training focuses us to follow a path, yet there has not been a succinct summation I cared to share until now. The British Institute of Learning Disabilities’s new Centre for the Advancement of Positive Behaviour Support has commissioned a video animation to help explain PBS. I have put it here and also an easily memorable short link for you to this video.

Stress Training Courses

A service director the other day commented how it was only on Physical Intervention training that the staff start questioning to the Nth degree about scenarios and possible outcomes of events. She stated that it would not happen on a first aid course. Well I know a first aid trainer who would disagree, however I have been on a lot of training as a participant in the last year (see biog) and can agree her point is valid.

The Assumption about Physical Intervention Training

What would you do? This seems to be an innocent question with a straight forward answer. However, when asked by someone who works in healthcare industry, assumptions take over and most people are convinced they know exactly what that entails – lets look at the options

Care Learning Conference

June 12th 2014 saw D.ESCAL8 running workshops and being a major sponsor of the Care Learning Conference. This fantastic day led to our "Communicating with individuals in distress" workshops being full within minutes of the doors opening as the delegates chose which workshops to attend.